cdma fwt,cdma fct,cdma terminal,cdma converter,cdma ...

cdma fwt,cdma fct,cdma terminal,cdma converter,cdma ...

We are a manufacturer of cdma fwt,cdma fct,cdma terminal,cdma converter,cdma ...,providing professional service and high quality products.We are good at producing FWT cdma wireless terminal,and have strong design capabilities.Besides reasonable price and high quality FWT cdma wireless terminal products, we can also provide more value-added services.Business is only the first step. We hope to establish a long-term relationship with you through our factory's trustworthy products.Good service, customers will be more assured, business will be more long-term.I wish you and your family peace and beauty, good health and happiness forever.

Products Detail

We are a manufacturer of cdma fwt,cdma fct,cdma terminal,cdma converter,cdma ...,providing professional service and high quality products.We are good at producing FWT cdma wireless terminal,and have strong design capabilities.Besides reasonable price and high quality FWT cdma wireless terminal products, we can also provide more value-added services.Business is only the first step. We hope to establish a long-term relationship with you through our factory's trustworthy products.Good service, customers will be more assured, business will be more long-term.I wish you and your family peace and beauty, good health and happiness forever.

FWT cdma wireless terminalFWT cdma wireless terminal

Predatory pricing or competitive entry approach? it really is the query now being asked of the bid via chinese telecom enterprise Huawei technologies for public sector BSNL's soft for a million CDMA-primarily based FWT telephones in rural areas (actually fastened wireless Terminals are land line telephones which are connected wirelessly and never via a copper line).

After successful the bid for MTNL's ( million) CDMA phones a little over a year in the past, Huawei appears all set to do the equal with BSNL with a cost quote around 37 per cent that of US rival Lucent applied sciences.

while Lucent has bid $eighty three million for the contract (for the network, now not the mobile instruments), Huawei's bid $31 million. For some critical add-ons just like the MSC and the BSC, Huawei's bid is a seventh that of Lucent's $ million!

With this sort of low bid that has the competencies to trade the dynamics of the cell telephony market, which is growing to be through close to million subscribers a month, Huawei's opponents are naturally incensed and unique shows were made both to BSNL officials in addition to telecom ministry ones on how the chinese are doing predatory pricing.

it is mentioned, for instance, that while usual notebook workstations which can be used in the network cost round Rs 30,000 apiece, Huawei's bid places the can charge of these as most effective Rs 209; a solar Solaris working gadget charges Rs four,500 whereas Huawei prices this at Rs 9; a solar Blade server charges Rs one hundred fifty,000 whereas the chinese enterprise is charging just Rs 347 for this.

No details are offered, youngsters, of simply how an awful lot all such bought-out gadgets add as much as within the Huawei bid, whether this is a major or a mere a part of the bid. right now, notwithstanding, the difference between Huawei's bid and that of the others is simply too giant to be defined best by using the artificial pricing of bought-out items.

a further allegation made is that whereas, traditionally for such initiatives, hardware expenses account for around 70 per cent of the entire venture and software makes up the stability, Huawei has flipped this round to save on customs responsibility.

while Huawei says its strategic pricing is a part of an entry approach for a very colossal market, it categorically denies the customs duty can charge and says its hardware/software ratios are 70:30, which is the appropriate restrict.

interestingly, each BSNL and the telecom ministry, who are the simplest ones to know even if the prices and rebuttals are suitable or now not, seem unmoved, and have talked about there's little they could do in a aggressive tender of this category. nor is any allegation being made about Huawei's technology being of a bad excellent due to the fact, earlier than being allowed to make a fiscal bid, each vendor's gadget has to move field trials.

even if Huawei's bid is predatory is, of path, a moot element for the reason that, by way of definition, predatory pricing is done by means of a person who has superb market vigor (which Huawei doesn't) or with the aid of someone who is subsidised in a manner now not available to the competitor -- continually this ability a government subsidy.

in the bid for Unocal in the US by way of chinese language enterprise CNOOC, for instance, rival bidder Chevron has argued that the CNOOC offer is funded partly via subsidised govt loans that simply assist CNOOC carry its bid fee by way of about $10 per Unocal share.

CNOOC, naturally disputes this claim, however the point here is that, if genuine, this is a legitimate reason for Chevron to claim predatory practices. so far, within the case of the BSNL tender, US opponents have not even made this declare, leave by myself substantiated it. (When Reliance Infocomm came out with its Monsoon Hangama offers and 40 paise country wide lengthy-distance phones from one Reliance phone to another, the telecom regulator didn't take any action on the mobile business's grievance of predatory pricing exactly as a result of Reliance turned into a brand new entrant with zero market vigor in telecom, and if it wanted to burn up its cash, then so be it.)

Of course, if this type of charge of government subsidies to Huawei is to be made, it must be made to the executive seeing that it contains chinese businesses being subsidised unfairly whereas competing with US establishments. there's nothing that either BSNL or government officers can do, more so given the strict adherence it truly is paid to the bottom-bid criterion.

Postscript: yet another situation that comes up very forcefully, of direction, is that of the access Deficit cost (at present round Rs 5,500 crore a 12 months) that's paid by way of buyers every 12 months to mounted-line provider providers -- each and every time you are making or get hold of an extended-distance name, both a national or a world one, you pay a set cost per minute and here's distributed to fixed-line provider providers with a purpose to cover the change between their fees and the lessen tariff that they can charge purchasers.

well, if a CDMA-based line can charge round Rs 1,500 each and every (CDMA-based mostly mobile traces of the type provided by way of Reliance and the Tatas charge 10-15 per cent more than CDMA-based mostly FWTs of the category BSNL is establishing), and the very basic cellular handset fees one other Rs 1,500-2,000, this makes the full cost of the line around Rs three,000-3,500 per subscriber.

In assessment, a land line expenses anyplace between Rs 10,000 and 12,000. Naturally, if ADC funds for clean traces are going to be calculated on the foundation of Rs 10,000 per line they will be dramatically greater than if they're calculated for a provider that prices simply Rs 3,000-3,500.

curiously, way back to October 2003, when Trai became giving its strategies on unified licensing, it said the charge of instant traces to fixed wire strains was 1:3! And yet it continues to supply ADC to even new fastened-wire lines!

Tags

Leave your messages:

Send Inquiry Now

Related Products

Send Inquiry Now